Metric IDDescription 2.1.1Due consideration is given to equity and inclusiveness by providing reservation of seats to all categories. Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years 2.1.2Student Demand Ratio applicable to programmes where state / central common entrance tests are not conducted 2.1.3Student enrollment pattern and student profile demonstrate national/international spread of enrolled students from other states and countries 2.2.1The Institution assesses the learning levels of the students after admission and organises special programmes for advanced learners and slow performers The Institution: Adopts measurable criteria to identify low performers. Adopts measurable criteria to identify advanced learners Organizes special programmes for low performers and advanced learners Follows protocols to measure students’ achievement 2.2.2Student - Full- time teacher ratio (data of preceding academic year) 2.3.2 Has provision for the use of Clinical Skills Laboratory and Simulation Based Learning The Institution: Has Basic Clinical Skills Training Models and Trainers for clinical skills in the relevant disciplines. Has advanced patient simulators for simulation-based training Has structured programs for training and assessment of students in Clinical Skills Lab / Simulation centre Conducts training programs for the faculty in the use of clinical skills lab and simulation methods of teaching-learning 2.3.4Student :Mentor Ratio (preceding academic year) 2.4.1Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years 2.4.2Average percentage of fulltime teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc./D.Lit./ DM/M Ch/DNB in super specialities /other PG degrees (like MD/ MS/ MDS etc.,) in Health Sciences for recognition as Ph.D guides as per the eligibility criteria stipulated by the Regulatory Councils / Universities during the last five years 2.4.3Average teaching experience of fulltime teachers in number of years (preceding academic year) 2.4.4 Average percentage of teachers trained for development and delivery of e-contents / e-courses / video lectures / demonstrations during the last 5 years. 2.4.5Average percentage of fulltime teachers who received awards and recognitions for excellence in teaching, student mentoring, scholarships, professional achievements and academic leadership at State, National, International levels from Government / Government-recognized agencies / registered professional associations / academics during the last five years 2.5.1Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination to the date of declaration of results during the last five years 2.5.2Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number of students appeared in the examinations during the last five years 2.5.3Evaluation-related Grievance Redressal mechanism followed by the Institution: The University adopts the following mechanism for the redressal of evaluation-related grievances. Options(Opt one which is applicable to you): Double valuation/Multiple valuation with appeal process for retotalling/revaluation and access to answer script Double Valuation/Multiple valuation with appeal process for revaluation only Double Valuation/Multiple valuation with appeal process for retotalling only Single valuation and appeal process for revaluation Grievance Redressal mechanism does not exist 2.5.5Status of automation of the Examination division, using Examination Management System (EMS) along with an approved online Examination Manual Complete automation of entire division & implementation of the Examination Management System (EMS) Student registration, hall ticket issue & result processing Student registration and result processing Result processing Manual methodology 2.6.2Incremental performance in Pass percentage of final year students during last five years
CHAT WITH A STUDENT